However the three cases did not infringe any human rights as women are supposed to be subjugated to men or their female employers. Discuss.

These three articles are respectively about female being ill treated in different parts of the world. I disagree that the three cases did not infringe any human rights just because woman are supposed to be subjugated to men or their female employers. In many parts of the world, we have already acknowledged that men and women are of equals, however there are still people who believe in the superiority of men.

How can we say that no human rights were infringed when in the first article, the woman was forced to have sex with three of the enforcement officers just to keep her job? and in the second article, where the indonesian maid was being abused by her employer or the last article where women were being raped in their makeshift shelter. It is sad to see incidents like these happening and yet not much help is given. In the first and second article, the two women are being abused in their workplace, it is sick to see such things happening as they are just trying to work and to earn a living. However, they are subjected to such ill treatments during their work. And in the last article, the women was even raped in front of their children, it is sad to see such things happening, they are already struggling to survive and yet the rapists had to do such an sick act to degrade the women further in front of their children.

As women, we keep fighting for our own rights, fighting to be an equal of men, how much more do we need to prove ourselves? In the past, women might have depended on men but we have proven that we can do things independently. The protection of women by law has improved a lot, however there are still cases of discrimination happening.

I feel strongly for the victims of the unfortunate incidents and I hope that justice will served for the women and that the authorities will tighten the security in the makeshift camps so that such incidents will not happen again.